Tasklet got big fast. Here's the bet I would test.

At the start of 2026, Tasklet was around $385K in recurring revenue. Five months later, the ARR headline was $10M.

Andrew Lee, a Firebase co-founder, confirmed a $7M run rate in June.

If you're a builder, the obvious reaction is: should I build another Tasklet?

I get it. The numbers are wild, the product looks simple from the outside, and horizontal software always seems to leave room for one more good UX.

But Tasklet did not spend those five months waiting. It kept shipping.

It now connects to more than 3,000 tools, can use a browser, run code, work on a schedule, and remember context. Teams can share agents and connections without handing everyone the same access.

Another platform means fighting Tasklet, Zapier, and n8n. I would rather look for a job they all leave unfinished.

Do not hunt for something Tasklet cannot do. Look for someone who can use it and still cannot finish the job.

Sometimes the gap is setup or trust. Sometimes it is one weird invoice that breaks every Friday.

An accounts team does not want an agent platform. It wants the invoices reconciled before Friday and someone to call when one is wrong.

Tasklet may be able to do most of that. The team may still pay you to make it easy and own the exceptions.

The asymmetry is in the last mile: Tasklet does most of the work, but a small layer of setup and responsibility may turn it into a result worth much more to the customer than it costs the builder to deliver. It remains a bet until someone pays and the exceptions leave enough margin.

You are not trying to beat Tasklet at being Tasklet. You are using it underneath and building the missing path to the result.

How I would test it

Pick one job that people already pay a person or agency to finish.

Run the real workflow in Tasklet before you write much code. Keep track of what breaks and how often you have to step in.

Then sell the finished job, not another dashboard.

If the buyer prefers using Tasklet alone, stop. If your manual fixes eat the margin, stop.

But if they pay because you make the work feel simple and take responsibility when it goes wrong, there may be a business.

As Tasklet gets better, it becomes easier to build a business around one specific job. The mistake is trying to build another Tasklet.

That is the asymmetric bet I would test: one annoying job, Tasklet underneath, and a buyer paying for the finished result.